File talk:WinterOlympics94.jpg

Not convinced the newer scan is any better. Looks a bit bright.

Not convinced the older scan is any better. Looks a bit dark!

Hard to remember the actual box since I scanned it at least six years ago (and we should have had this discussion then!) - but it was scanned with the same methods as all my other scans - so it should be accurate.

XtC 15:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Shall we ask Kyzer which he prefers? :)

BuZz 16:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Looking at them again, I really think the older scan is better. Look at the right side. On yours it is only "white" but on the older scan you can see the gradient. Look like the brightness setting might be too high on yours. If this is the setting you used for all, then it is a bit worrying :-)

BuZz 16:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Why is it so worrying? At least I've filled some gaps in the collection!

If you'd mentioned any of this to me 6 years ago when I scanned them and still had the boxes...

XtC 21:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, worrying is the wrong word perhaps, but it might mean other details are lost due to "over exposure". Your contributions are appreciated. It is not something you can notice unless you have the box to compare against though, or in this case another scan. Anyway. I rolled back in this occasion. The scan would have been fine if it was the only one we had, but as we have a choice. Nice to have the other gaps filled. BuZz 23:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC)